Decentralization Reforms in Mexico:
The Intersection of Neoliberalization and Democratization Processes

Aylin Topal

Since the 1980s, most international donors and developmental agencies have been
significantly investing in and funding decentralization processes in Latin America. They
assumed that by bringing political decisions closer to the citizenry, decentralization would
naturally lead to more participatory subnational governments and empowered local
communities. To test this optimistic assumption, this article examines decentralization
reforms in Mexico vis-à-vis neoliberalization and democratization processes. Based
on interviews with key actors, local and national newspapers and related primary
and secondary sources, this article concludes that in Mexico, decentralization policies
are the intersection set of neoliberalization and democratization processes. The part
played by neoliberalization in decentralization processes ensures that the latter would
not lead either directly or unproblematically to democratization. In 1983, Institutional
Revolutionary Party (PRI), faced with a deep hegemony crisis, responded to two sets
of demands. Threatened by the bank nationalization in 1983, certain sections of the
capitalist classes have increased the pressure for a smaller state, while workers, peasants
and indigenous groups have demanded democratization and more participation. PRI
chose to implement decentralization policies with the intention of receiving consent from
these various social groups while at the same time strengthening the local organization
of the party with new political, administrative and financial faculties. The multifaceted
nature of these decentralization reforms explains the varying impacts of these policies at
the local level. This article shows that in the Northern regions, where the local capitalist
groups are organized, the party of the political right, the National Action Party (PAN),
came to power. However, there are hints that decentralization policies may empower
other local parties. Parties ideologically closer the workers, peasants and indigenous
groups, like Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD), can organize at the local level and with
this support can present a viable alternative in 2006 presidential elections.