{"id":4776,"date":"2026-10-28T19:33:11","date_gmt":"2026-10-28T17:33:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/publication-ethics\/"},"modified":"2026-10-28T21:12:04","modified_gmt":"2026-10-28T19:12:04","slug":"publication-ethics","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/publication-ethics\/","title":{"rendered":"Publication Policy &#038; Ethics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Praksis bases its publication ethics on COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and its own editorial experience.<\/p>\n<h2>Responsibilities of Authors<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Submissions must be clear, accessible and free of discriminatory language.<\/li>\n<li>The work must be original, unpublished and not under review elsewhere.<\/li>\n<li>Where plagiarism is detected, the manuscript is removed from the review process.<\/li>\n<li>Citations must be complete and follow the journal\u2019s citation system.<\/li>\n<li>Only those who have made a substantial contribution may be listed as authors.<\/li>\n<li>Funding and financial support must be disclosed.<\/li>\n<li>Authors revise in line with reviewer reports, or explain in writing why they will not.<\/li>\n<li>Significant errors in published work must be reported without delay.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Responsibilities of Editors<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Editors decide on rejection, acceptance, referral to reviewers or requests for further information; the final decision rests on reviewer reports.<\/li>\n<li>Content is the sole criterion for acceptance; the author\u2019s identity is not a factor.<\/li>\n<li>As a rule two positive reports are required. Where reports conflict, a third reviewer is consulted and editors make the final decision.<\/li>\n<li>All decisions are communicated to authors with reasons.<\/li>\n<li>Information about submissions is kept confidential; editors withdraw from the process in cases of conflict of interest.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Responsibilities of Reviewers<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Reviewers keep the manuscript and the author\u2019s identity confidential.<\/li>\n<li>Reviews cover both content and formal aspects such as citation style, abstract and language, with respect for the author\u2019s work.<\/li>\n<li>Reviewers decline the invitation where the work falls outside their expertise, where they can identify the author, or where they cannot meet the deadline.<\/li>\n<li>Decisions must be justified in detail and conflicts of interest disclosed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Publication ethics for authors, editors and reviewers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4776","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4776"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4776\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4841,"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4776\/revisions\/4841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.praksis.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}